How to make current handgun control laws stronger, and more Research Proposal

How to make current hand grinder command laws stronger, and more enforceable - Research Proposal frameworkInstead it offer an umbrella protection to everyone by making laws which are definitely worth their weight in gold but are non actually imposed by all states. The gaps between state and federal gun turn back laws make the problem even worse.Federal gun control policy is simple firearms must not reach irresponsible or dangerous wad. This approach is particularly un disputable and hence approved by almost quarters. Some of the key laws in this regard are the 1968 law passed in response to the killing of Robert Kennedy, the federal law prohibiting sale of firearm without background check, and bulwark on sales to illegal aliens. These laws should have been good enough to stop some incidents like the Virginia Tech massacre but the reason they failed lies in gaps subsisting between state and federal laws. Due to these gaps, Seung-Hui Cho was never reported to the federal police as he has already been termed mentally ill. According to 1968 federal law, people who are adjudicated as a mental defective are prohibited from possessing firearms. This is probably the most significant piece of legislation on gun control in last 50 years. Even though attempts have been made to pass other laws too, none have been as significant in their impingement as the Gun Control Act of 1968. The main objectives of the Act were as follows (1) Eliminating the interstate traffic in firearms and ammunition that had previously frustrated state and topical anesthetic efforts to license, register, or restrict ownership of guns. (2) Denying access to firearms to certain congressionally defined groups, including minors, convicted felons, and persons who had been adjudicated as mental defectives or committed to mental institutions. (3) Ending the importation of all exorbitance military firearms and all other guns unless certified by the Secretary of the Treasury as particularly suita ble for ... sporting purposes.2The country needs stricter gun control laws but a recent US Supreme Court decision may give another message. In June 2008, US Supreme lawcourt gave an emphatic nod to firearm owners when it overturned a Washington DC ban on possession of guns. No other recent decision was as vital in significance as this one since it offered an interpretation of the Second Amendment and also explained how constitution treats the subject. In writing the majority opinion, Justice Scalia, ruled that the name does not infer the absolute prohibition of handguns held and used for self-defense in the home.3For this reason gun control laws are definitely one of the most controversial issues in the country. Even though we acknowledge the need for stricter gun control laws, the Supreme Court interpretations of the Constitutions and other rights, often create a hurdle for the murder and passing of these laws. Jenson (2007) writes Gun control legislation has had a long and inco nsistent history in the United States. Congress first passed laws controlling firearms in the earlyish 20th century. Throughout the past century, the issue has been debated frequently by opponents and proponents. Each side has used a different interpretation of the Second Amendment of the Constitution, a render giving citizens the right to bear arms, to boost its arguments for or against gun control.